Monday, September 23, 2019
If
you find Holmes and Poirot insufficiently cerebral, a little too
everyday action hero, then Zaleski is the detective for you. Exiled and
lovelorn, he broods alone (but for a black manservant, of whom frankly
the less said the better) in a wing of a ruined abbey set among
cypresses and poplars. We first see him reclining beside a
partially-unwrapped mummy, "discarding his gemmed chibouque and an old
vellum reprint of Anacreon". From the opulent, narcotic haze of this
sanctum he declines to shift for the first two adventures, unravelling
otherwise insoluble mysteries of ancestral curses and ancient gems
simply from what is reported to him by the narrator Shiel, who might
thus be considered a far more poetically-inclined Watson. Shiel
considered himself Doyle's superior, and the solutions are exactly the
sort of thing someone might come up with when they're trying to outdo
Holmes but haven't twigged the very precise - if indefinable - limits of
fairness in a puzzle; everything hinges on word association, dubious
scholarship and the like, such that the reader's reaction is less likely
to be 'Good heavens!' that 'You what?' But in Holmes the intricate
solutions were only ever part of the appeal, and in Zaleski they're
barely even that. It's the atmosphere that matters. And in the last of
these three original stories*, that atmosphere is whipped into such a
ferment that you start to wonder if Shiel (the writer) was receiving
some distorted yet overwhelming vision of the future. True, there is the
line at which one can only respond with a hollow laugh, where Zaleski
tells his friend that war will doubtless be extinct within their
lifetimes. But otherwise...an epidemic of murder and insanity which
begins in Germany. Eugenic tirades. Visions of a future society in which
technological advancement goes hand-in-hand with sacrificial hecatombs
devoted to preserving the purity of the race. And the story is entitled
'The S.S.'.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment